College Media Network

NAACP reacts to racist messages

Student leaders will continue dialogue this week, NAACP leader wants to meet with Chancellor

Chris Allred

News Editor

Print this article

Published: Monday, November 10, 2008

Updated: Monday, November 10, 2008

IMAGE ##: NAACP reacts to racist messages

© 2008 NCSU Student Media

Andrew Poon, a senior in engineering, sings a poem to a crowd during a speak out about the incidents in the Free Expression Tunnel. He wrote the poem for the International Activities Council show on Friday night. “I guess it is just further proof that the world needs change,” Poon said. (Photo by Luis Zapata.)

Student and regional leaders continued to confront issues from the racist messages left by four students in the Free Expression Tunnel last week.

Rev. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP, sent an open letter to Chancellor James Oblinger encouraging a "strong response and punishment" for the students' actions.

Barber said he has not been satisfied with the University's response to the racist spray-painted messages, which targeted president-elect Barack Obama.

"The first concern we have was this is not graffiti," he said. "At the start, to label it as such and to discuss it as such we think is very troubling. You have to begin right if you're going to end right."

After Secret Service and Campus Police investigated spray-painted messages left in the tunnel Wednesday morning, including "Let's shoot that n----- in the head," the Secret Service concluded that the four students who had admitted to it had not committed a crime.

Student Government hosted a "Unity Rally" Thursday that drew about 300 students, and during it, Tracey Ray, director of multicultural student affairs, expressed that she wanted the public to have more information about the acts and those who committed them.

Barber wants to meet with the Chancellor Wednesday with leaders of the NAACP to discuss the issues surrounding the messages and the University's response and look at all available evidence, he said.

According to Barber, he had not been contacted by a University official as of Sunday afternoon, but he expected a call Monday.

If the University does not effectively discourage acts like this, Barber said it could lead to a more hostile environment with more consequences.

"We in the civil rights community understand, black and white, that often times violence or harmful acts were preceded by ugly speech," he said.

That the students who painted the messages were still likely walking around campus angered Barber.

"When the Chancellor says he's not going to tolerate it, the question is, what does that mean?" Barber said. "Does that mean persons who engage in it are going to experience a level of punishment equal to the crime?"

Student leaders will meet Tuesday at 6:30 p.m. in the Witherspoon Student Center to discuss the issues raised by last week's events, and James Hankins, a senior in political science, said many students are expecting more from the University.

"Anybody who's willing to put something like that is either too immature to be at the University or is too dangerous to be at the University," Hankins said.

University officials must be sure not to treat any instance like this as a joke, he said.

"I hope a very diverse group of students show up so that we can discuss these things openly and honestly so that nothing like this will ever be taken lightly on campus again," Hankins said.

Barber said that by labeling the racist messages as "graffiti," the University was making them seem less harmful.

"These matters are not light matters to be played with and we don't take them as such," he said. "While we may not chase every incident that happens, the sinister and suggestive and direct nature of this incident gives us great concern and great pause and has to be addressed."

The campus chapter of the NAACP met with student leaders Saturday, according to Student Body President Jay Dawkins.

"There are a lot of calls for individuals' names to be released and at this point, the University's hands are tied by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act," he said. "At this point we need to focus on continuing work to improve our campus atmosphere and to instill values of respect and tolerance.

Dawkins said students should continue to support the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, and Student Government will host a town hall forum Nov. 15 to focus on the racial issues of the past week.

"It takes more than a rally alone," he said. "It takes a commitment from each of us to reach out to our fellow students to build understanding and dispel ignorance."

Comments

9 comments
Temeka Brown
Wed Nov 12 2008 13:56
I think its funny that every time something like this happens there are always that select few that think its okay for them to say ridiculous things like "lets see what the NAAWP has to say about this." I mean really people, is it necessary for you to stoop to that childish level as to go so far and disrespect an organization which has fought so hard to gain equality for ALL people not just African Americans? I feel that the names should be released because if those MEN were bold enough to make those disgusting racists comments in the "free expression" tunnel for all to see, then they should be MAN enough to stand behind those comments and face their peers. This is no joke and to be completely honest having gang symbols..black panther logo's (which I have NEVER seen) and F--- McCain comments does not bother me because these things are not attacking OUR president.
Donnie Charleston
Tue Nov 11 2008 22:17
Lets be clear - the Secret Service decided not to pursue the incident. They never made a ruling on the legality of the actions. Their role is to protect the President and they deemed the individuals as a non-credible threat. The Secret Service actions in no way excuses the student's actions or should be taken as support for a "do nothing" policy by the University. They clearly left it up to the University to deal with the situation as they see fit. Lastly, the Supreme Court is clear about this type of speech. If it is aimed at inciting violent action toward an individual/group, then it is not protected by the Constitution. The "graffiti" in question arguably clearly meets the standard.
Jezzette Rivera
Tue Nov 11 2008 14:27
i think they already made their opinions clear with what they wrote in the free expression tunnel...
Brett Favre
Mon Nov 10 2008 22:38
Why don't we see what The National Association of the Advancement of White Peoples (NAAWP) thinks about this situation???
Katelyn Clontz
Mon Nov 10 2008 15:10
I completely feel that the comments made by these students were unnecessary and way out of line, however, the Secret Service concluded that these 4 students have NOT committed a crime. I think the University is dealing with this as best they can, and I don't feel that the NAACP should really be involved in this at all. The University condemned the writings, students held a peace rally to promote unity within the campus, and we're now hosting African Awareness Week here at the campus. I really think that's a POSITIVE way to move on from this. I don't think releasing names of these 4 students will do ANYTHING positive for the school. What legitimate reasons are there to release the names? If names are released, I really think that there would be physical threats made to these 4 students. I cannot think of any reason why these names should be released.
Jezzette Rivera
Mon Nov 10 2008 13:20
If this is an issue affecting STUDENTS in the NC State population and those individuals happen to be members of the NAACP, they are more then justified to have a say in this manner. Yes it is called the "free expression tunnel" but when that is resulting in an uncomfortable and threatening enviornment for students in the NC State community, then outside officials must step in to address this matter. Clearly acts of racism have NOT been handled well enough by university officials in the past to earse the ignorant, disrespectful, and blatant acts of racism and discrimination that have happened over the last year. Students need to UNITE to take a stance against this and who better to support and assist in this matter than an organizaiton that has experienced and overcome these issues for decades.
Zack Greenhill
Mon Nov 10 2008 12:07
The NAACP is a racist organization. I have walked through the tunnel, and seen F--- McCain, Black Power, Black Panther logo's, Gang symbols, and these things go un-noticed. The truth is, what the students wrote is completley legal under the first amendment in the constitution. The rally that was held to "unite" campus was a waste of time. Students are already sore after their candidate lost, and all the celebration from the Obama supporters was just the salt in the open wound. These actions were brought on by the Liberal community themselves. I'm not saying what was written was right, nor do i agree with it. But they have just as much a right to say or write it, as anyone else in this country as to protest against it. Punishing these students is only creating a double standard.
Brett Favre
Mon Nov 10 2008 11:11
The NAACP needs to mind their own business and let the university handle this. After all it is a "free expression" tunnel and the NAACP should have no say in the way the university decides to handle this matter.
Thomas Duke
Mon Nov 10 2008 08:14
While these actions are not what NC State is about, tragically they were perpetrated by members of our community. Having said that, the university should be allowed to process these individuals without making their names public.

We, as members of the university community, need to stand up behind our leaders to demonstrate our intolerance to hate and reinforce the notion that NC State is passionately inclusive.

Log in Log in to be able to post comments.